Saba George Nanobashvili vs Jeiden Saidizand Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 12 Aug at 12:49 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
S. George Nanobashvili vs J. Saidizand

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

SWE
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nanobashvili 1 - 0 Saidizand
They have played 2 sets in total, with Saba George Nanobashvili winning 2 and Jeiden Saidizand winning 0. The last match between Saba George Nanobashvili and Jeiden Saidizand was at the M15 Ystad, 12-08-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Clay, with Saba George Nanobashvili getting the victory 6-4 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nanobashvili | 1 |
| Saidizand | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) M15 Ystad(08-12-25)
S. G. Nanobashvili vs J. Saidizand H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.58% (34-39) | Career Total W/L | 41.51% (22-31) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
S. G. Nanobashvili vs J. Saidizand Match Preview:
- Saidizand has demonstrated stronger second serve performance recently, winning 50.72% of points, significantly outperforming Nanobashvili, who has won only 26.67%.
- Considering return stats on the opponent's second serve, Nanobashvili slightly edges out Saidizand with 50.5% to 45.05%, suggesting a potential advantage.
- On the first serve returns, Saidizand holds a clear advantage, winning 35.23% compared to Nanobashvili's 30%, making a case for Saidizand being favored.
- Under pressure, Saidizand is more effective, saving 54.55% of breakpoints compared to Nanobashvili’s 37.5%.
- Overall match performance in the past year favors Nanobashvili, with a win rate of 48.57% compared to Saidizand's 38.46%.
- Saidizand excels on indoor hard courts with a 50% win rate, whereas Nanobashvili's best is on hard courts with a 57% win rate, hinting at a potential surface preference.
- The level of opponents faced differs; Saidizand has competed against unranked opponents, while Nanobashvili has faced players with an average rank of 106.09.
- In deciding sets, Nanobashvili performs better, winning 50% compared to Saidizand’s 33% success rate.
- Both players display similar efficiency in break point conversion, with Saidizand at 43.48% and Nanobashvili at 36.84%.
Editorial Prediction (August 12, 2025, UTC):
Saidizand's recent performance highlights a significant edge in second serve effectiveness, which is often a critical factor in close matches.
Though Nanobashvili showcases a slightly better return game and higher overall win percentage, Saidizand's ability to save breakpoints gives them a potential psychological edge, particularly under pressure.
Considering these statistics along with Saidizand's first serve return success, they may exploit this advantage in long rallies and high-stakes points.
Furthermore, both players have shown similar break point conversion rates, suggesting the match could be closely contested.
In light of these factors, Saidizand appears to have a slight edge and is more likely to emerge victorious in this upcoming tennis match.
Saba George Nanobashvili vs Jeiden Saidizand Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
S. G. Nanobashvili vs J. Saidizand H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 9 |
| 2 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 9 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 1:50:16 | Average Match Time | 1:50:16 |
| 49% (37/75) | 1st Serve % | 55% (41/75) |
| 62% (23/37) | 1st Serve Win % | 51% (21/41) |
| 39% (15/38) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (13/34) |
| 50% (7/14) | Break Pts Won % | 45% (5/11) |
| 55% (41/75) | Return Points Win % | 49% (37/75) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
S. G. Nanobashvili Recent Matches Played
J. Saidizand Recent Matches Played

S. G. Nanobashvili vs J. Saidizand Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.58% (34/39) | YTD Win/Loss | 41.51% (22/31) |
| 46.34% (76/88) | Sets Win/Loss | 44.26% (54/68) |
| 48.65% (775/818) | Games Win/Loss | 44.53% (525/654) |
| 55.88% (19/15) | Hard Win/Loss | 20.00% (2/8) |
| 35.48% (11/20) | Clay Win/Loss | 46.88% (15/17) |
| 50.00% (4/4) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.45% (5/6) |
| 0.1 | Aces Per Game | 0.1 |
| 81 | Aces Total | 56 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.16 |
| 200 | Total Double Faults | 92 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 118.99 | Average Opponent Rank | 142.62 |
| 58% (1613/2762) | 1st Serve % | 58% (1179/2042) |
| 61% (991/1613) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (715/1179) |
| 41% (476/1149) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (412/863) |
| 49% (129/264) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 45% (98/218) |
| 42% (1090/2572) | Return Points Win % | 42% (831/1992) |
| 46.58% (34/39) | Futures W/L | 41.51% (22/31) |
| 47% (34/72) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 42% (22/53) |
| 47% (7/15) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 63% (5/8) |
| 58% (11/19) | Deciding Set Win % | 38% (6/16) |
| 80% (35/28) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 77% (26/20) |
| 20% (35/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 23% (26/6) |
| 16% (38/6) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 7% (27/2) |